Comparative Analysis: V vs. Umpire Mold Remediation Approaches

Project Overview

This analysis compares two remediation approaches: one by a company referred to as 'V' (name changed for privacy) and another by Umpire Mitigation. Umpire's solution was successfully verified by independent Industrial Hygienist testing through multiple air and surface samples.

Cost Comparison

V (March 2022 Proposal): $61,115.22
Umpire (August 2023 Completed Work): $8,214.50
Cost Savings: $52,900.72

Methodologies

V's Proposed Approach ($61,115.22)

• Primary Method: Soda blasting
• Extensive preparation including furniture moving, full room sealing
• Insulation removal and replacement
• Multiple negative air machines
• Complex containment systems
• 16-day estimated project duration

Umpire's Successful Approach ($8,214.50)

• Primary Method: Two-part hydrogen peroxide treatment
• Cold fog application for airborne and surface mold
• HEPA vacuum and wipe-down procedure
• Strategic air scrubber placement
• Dehumidification
• 3-day project duration
• Verified successful through independent testing

Areas Addressed

Both companies treated:

• Basement
• Stairs
• Two crawlspaces

Key Insights

1. Umpire's approach achieved verified success at 13.4% of V's proposed cost
2. Project duration reduced by 81% (3 days vs. 16 days)
3. Independent verification confirmed Umpire's effectiveness
4. Both approaches covered identical areas with dramatically different methodologies

Conclusion

While both companies aimed to address the same mold issues, Umpire's more targeted approach proved successful through independent verification, while requiring significantly less time and financial investment. This suggests that more invasive and expensive remediation methods may not always be necessary for effective mold remediation.

Contact

Questions for Umpire Mitigation? Call or text 703-665-1129 or visit www.umpiremitigation.com

‍